Shobha De has blogged about this article on Sunanda Pushkar by a journalist Vrinda Gopinath. Reading that article on Su made me see red. I don’t know which newspaper/magazine published this story, but Shobha has blogged the entire story on her blog.
The article is a nice example of how shoddy journalism can get. The writer seems to suggest that Shashi Tharoor was merely a victim and that Sunanda does not really belong to the ‘class’ of people who really deserve to be popular, and Su just used Shashi to get where she had to get in the Dubai/Delhi circles. The whole article screams bitchiness and it seems like someone paid the journalist to do a hatchet job on Sunanda.
I will post the parts I found objectionable in this whole story and why I found them so:
Says a former rival acidly, “Sunanda would claw her way to a sponsor and have him eating out of her hands, she was not a girl’s girl.”
Oh yeah. Those girls who have men eating out of their hands. So bad…boo!
Sunanda was the p3p Queen of Masala Dubai, chasing the glittering mirage with vampire-like thirst—hyper networking and coursing business deals.
Now, tell me which businessman worth his salt is not a networking machine? I cannot think of a non-networking-hungry person ever being a great success?( unless we are talking about Mukesh Ambani, who has lots of baap ka paisa.) And why is that wrong? Why is she likened to a vampire? Just because she is a woman and she is supposed to rise to great heights just by her own hard work and not like other men who use the fact that they are well-connected?
Sure, it’s hard to make friends when you are living between two cities, but as a hostess sniffs, “Sunanda invites people she meets on a plane for an intimate dinner with the minister. It may be first class but this is not Dubai, this is Delhi, where pedigree counts, not wannabe.”
Notice how the ‘hostess’ who said the above quoted lines sounds like she is nursing a bruised ego? While she may have taken the ‘accepted’ route to fame and riches, being the wife of a rich ‘pedigreed’ man, here comes sue with her talent for being in the right place at the right time, knowing the right people and sweeps everyone off?
It seems like if a guy had done whatever Sunanda/Sue had done to get to the top, they would be called cut-throat, ambitious, but never bitched about the way Sue was. In fact, how many people are talking about how Shashi Tharoor or for that matter Lalit Modi got where they did? How many people have explored how these men might have side-stepped ethics and stepped upon people to rise to fame? Why is everyone then beating Sue down? And what is so wrong with being an ambitious woman? She might have broken hearts on her way to the top, but she did not seem to have really done anything illegal(perhaps until now, when she garnered her sweat equity from IPL-Kochi). I am not saying she is doodh ki dhuli, but they are making her out to be some vamp out to use all the men to rise up the social ladder.
One particular Outlook article I read about Tharoor talks about how he is not new to providing personal favors to women he ends up having a relationship with. So how come Tharoor is the poor guy and Sue is the sexy siren who wooed him and then threw him by the wayside? And why should a high society woman either be an ambitious bitch or a sati-savitri-wife of a rich man? Why can’t she be a little bit of both, or neither?


I didn’t read Shobha De’s blog but read the outlook one was had similar reaction. It is sad that to defend a guy one must malign the woman involved. This is the same logic our culture polices give when they ask girls to cover up because they entice men and “invite” rape. It is always a woman’s fault.
2 days back I had an argument with another journalist who wrote something similar in DNA.
These are my tweets (to read his replies, you can check his timeline)
“Read http://is.gd/bCdG1 by @RajeevSrinivasa old Malayalam adage ‘kanakam or kamini’ is redundant and irrelevant to the article.”
He even goes to the extend to say that Sunanda was given money to entice T.
Even if it’s true, isn’t it insulting for a man of T’s caliber?
I tweeted “@RajeevSrinivasa Even if the speculation about the lady is true, that Tharoor was indeed framed, Vishwamitra-Menaka parallel is appalling.”
Then he even justifies piddling 70 crores by comparing it to a traffic rule break and Modi scam = murder.
My reply was “@RajeevSrinivasa Traffic violation is not as wicked as murder but a scam is a scam. Do you also believe in lesser evils in politics?”
Anyways, we went back and forth. There’s no point in arguing with such cases because we still live in a society where woman must prove herself at every point. If she is rich then her past is questioned. The path she came up is retraced. She is maligned and society’s nouveau-riches mock at her forgetting their own ways.
How come Tharoor is naive to get ‘enticed’ by the woman even if we assume that she was indeed paid to do it? C’mon, the guy is a career diplomat and a politician!
While I agree that Tharoor’s misdeeds(if he actually is guilty) are really small compared to the giant scams of our other great politicians, that does not mean he is exonerated and she implicated. And like you said, if a well-read journalist has views like that, what can we expect of so-called lesser folks?
I support Shashi Tharoor because his involvement is yet not proven. I’m not going to have a different yardstick for him just because he is erudite and cultured compared to others in the job. The rules should be the same for all politicians. What I don’t support is cheap tactics to win him supporters.
As I mentioned on twitter, ST is a quintessential outsider and Congress rarely lets an outsider to outshine. I still believe that he will be back and the irony would be if he becomes Sports Minister.
Yeah that is true. That Tharoor is an outsider and large familial units like the Congress do not like outsiders outshining the toadies. He was also caught saying things against what the leader said so there he lost a lot of political mileage with the madam. All said and done I really hope he was just naive and not really intent on cheating.
LOL on the Sports Minister thing!
Nice one! There’s the interview with Tehelka that takes the same line: http://www.tehelka.com/story_main44.asp?filename=Ne010510coverstory.asp
ie- that the way Sunanda is being maligned is more about the rules Indian society sets for women than about corruption or anything else.
On that note, I’m still a bit baffled about what Shashi Tharoor has done wrong. Is it because ministers are not supposed to have any commercial interest? It’s never been stated clearly what his crime is. Even if we accept that Pushkar is a front for Tharoor and so he got payment for mentoring the team, is that illegal? I’m genuinely asking, because it it’s quite obvious that Indian politicians have commercials interests and this has never been the cause of much hoopla.
That said, I have no illusions about any politicians in India. I don’t believe it’s possible to be a politician or even a succesful businessperson in India and not have some corrupt dealings.
Tharoor is being accused of causing his girlfriend to earn money for nothing. The accusation is that Sunanda actually did nothing but got paid, so it is kind of like Tharoor was indirectly paid for showing up and causing the group that wanted to win the bid for the team, to win! Even if true, it does seem very small compared to the mammoth scams of our politicians, but it still would be illegal / be conflict of interest.
I agree that it would be impossible to find a non-corrupt politician / businessman. That might be true even in other countries. Definitely true in the US too.
I just read the interview on that link and I agree with Shoma and Sunanda. Why crucify her when she is merely trying to get a better life for herself. Is that wrong?
Nice one http://www.hindu.com/2010/04/24/stories/2010042453411300.htm
Very balanced and well written.
I agree. ‘Why crucify her when she is merely trying to get a better life for herself. Is that wrong?’
I just tweeted this,
Media witch-hunt : All successful single women are selfish, scheming seductresses & social climbers. http://bit.ly/cyMGHf
You are right. What is wrong with being ambitious. I guess the fact that she is a woman who is ambitious is wrong. How dare she?
“Sunanda invites people she meets on a plane for an intimate dinner with the minister. It may be first class but this is not Dubai, this is Delhi, where pedigree counts, not wannabe.”
There’s so much that is wrong in this sentence.
The use of the labels – wannabe and pedigree.
The belief that one must not try to rise above oneself.
That one person spoke it and another quoted it – like that’s all that’s needed to prove Su a bad person.
‘if it were not for Sunanda’s hyper hunger to rise above the plain folks…’
‘hyper hunger’? and rising above the plain folk is wrong? I thought all successful people claim to have felt a hunger to rise, ‘above the plain folk‘ is also the writer’s words.
Sad to see such a write up, I agree, it does look like someone was paid to do this.
I always thought India’s social glitteratti were obsessed with pedigree and haisiyat and all that. Things that would probably not matter in other countries. And outsiders who are a success are always looked down upon.
The way the journalist talks about how Sunanda is from a small Jammu town time and again it seems like someone from a small town has no right to be where she was!
I meant, ‘hyper hunger’?
And rising above the plain folk is wrong? I thought all successful people claim to have felt a hunger to rise.
And ‘above the plain folk‘ is the writer’s expression.
The article was just dreadful. People may form their own opinions about SP / ST but it is absolutely not done for a magazine to be indulging in this sort of writing – its slanderous, sexist and I think SP should sue them for their troubles.
REally Nice blog…I like this blog
I would like to share with you about this interesting blog contest for mothers day.www.blrmoms.com conducting a mothers day blog contest 2010.If you are interested participate with this contest and win cash prizes.More details about this blog contes click here to see this link
http://www.blrmoms.com/home/moms_thro_email_links?id=contest_smo
Note:You can ask your friends or mother to post blog about their experience also.If you are based in chennai please see this link
http://www.chennaimoms.com/home/moms_thro_email_links?id=contest_smo
Can you able to write about our contest in your blogs,if you need we will give link exchange offer also …